Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The strongest pattern is more specific. Collective belief became dangerous when private suspicions were converted into public certainty by courts, clergy, professionals, newspapers or broadcasters. Accusations then appeared to confirm one another: a tortured suspect named neighbours, an interviewer elicited similar stories from several children, or a dramatic media account supplied a ready-made explanation for ambiguous events. Dutch history also shows the reverse process. Sceptical magistrates, documentary investigation and improved interviewing standards could interrupt a panic, although often only after reputations, families or lives had been harmed.

Witch fear became lethal when courts made it self-replicating
Belief in harmful magic was widespread in the early modern Low Countries, but prosecution was uneven. A quarrel over illness, livestock, crops or unexplained misfortune did not automatically become a witch hunt. Escalation usually required officials to accept a more elaborate theory: that a suspected neighbour was not merely practising magic but had entered a pact with the Devil, attended secret gatherings and belonged to a wider conspiracy against Christian society. Once courts used coercive interrogation and demanded accomplices’ names, each confession could generate further arrests.
The most notorious example occurred around Roermond in 1613 and 1614, when the city formed part of the Spanish Netherlands. It is commonly described as the largest witch prosecution within the borders of the present-day Netherlands. More than sixty people, predominantly women, are said to have been executed. Exact totals vary between modern accounts because the original trial files have not survived; much of the reconstruction depends on a contemporary printed pamphlet and later scholarship. That missing archive matters. The scale of the killing is clear, but some of the most colourful details cannot be checked against complete court records.[wikipedia.org]WikipediaRoermond witch trialRoermond witch trial
The accusations combined everyday fears with learned demonology. Suspects were blamed for sickness, miscarriages, damaged harvests and dead animals, but such claims were folded into stories about diabolical sex, shape-shifting and nocturnal meetings. Torture created a closed evidential circle: confession was treated as proof, while denial could justify further pain. People under interrogation named supposed associates, enabling the proceedings to spread through social networks rather than remaining disputes between individual neighbours. Historians therefore interpret hunts such as Roermond not simply as spontaneous popular frenzy but as interactions between community grievances, religious ideas and judicial procedure.
Elsewhere, Dutch legal culture could work against escalation. Oudewater became famous for its weighing house, where people accused of witchcraft could obtain certificates stating that their weight was normal and that they were therefore not unnaturally light enough to fly. The procedure was based on the same false supernatural assumptions as the accusation, but its practical effect was protective: it offered an officially recognised route to acquittal rather than torture. The contrast with Roermond shows why “the Dutch witch panic” is misleading. Local jurisdiction, rules of evidence and the conduct of particular magistrates often determined whether gossip died away or became a chain of executions.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThey have raised €35,000 for this cause, seeking to highlight the tragedies that occurred due to mass hysteria and the scapegoating of "w…
Modern commemoration has reopened the question of what the persecutions meant. Roermond has publicly acknowledged the trials as a dark chapter, while campaigners have pressed for a national monument to those executed as witches. Some describe the hunts as an early form of gendered killing because most victims were women. Historians generally agree that gender hierarchy was central, but caution against reducing every case to a single organised campaign against women: poverty, reputation, age, family conflict, religious tension and local politics also shaped vulnerability.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThey have raised €35,000 for this cause, seeking to highlight the tragedies that occurred due to mass hysteria and the scapegoating of "w…
Apocalyptic belief and the Amsterdam revolt of 1535
The radical Reformation produced a different kind of collective-belief crisis. Anabaptists rejected infant baptism and argued that believers should choose baptism for themselves. That alone did not make them violent, and the great majority of later Mennonites became firmly committed to non-violence. During the 1530s, however, one apocalyptic branch expected the existing world to end and a godly kingdom to replace it.
Preacher Melchior Hoffman had carried Anabaptist ideas into the Low Countries while predicting an imminent divine transformation. After his timetable failed, Dutch followers Jan Matthijs and Jan van Leiden redirected expectation towards Münster, across the present German border. Radical Anabaptists took control of that city in 1534 and proclaimed it a New Jerusalem. The experiment developed into an authoritarian theocracy under siege, while sympathisers in the Netherlands interpreted events through the same end-times framework.[wikipedia.org]WikipediaMelchior HoffmanMelchior Hoffman
On 10 May 1535, about forty armed Anabaptists seized Amsterdam’s city hall. They hoped to make Amsterdam another holy city and assist the embattled movement in Münster. Municipal forces retook the building after fierce fighting in which attackers, guards and the mayor were killed. The surviving rebels were subjected to exemplary punishment. The revolt was real, organised and violent; calling it merely a panic would obscure that fact. Yet the fear it produced spread far beyond the small number directly involved. Authorities and opponents increasingly treated Anabaptism as synonymous with sedition, despite the movement’s internal diversity.[amsterdam.nl]amsterdam.nlOpen source on amsterdam.nl.
The aftermath illustrates how one spectacular faction can define an entire minority. Münster and Amsterdam supplied governments with an enduring image of the secretive, fanatical sect waiting to overthrow society. Menno Simons and other Dutch leaders subsequently rejected armed revolution and helped shape the pacifist Mennonite tradition. Their success did not immediately erase suspicion, but it demonstrates that the violent apocalyptic current was neither the only nor the inevitable form of Dutch Anabaptism.[Wikipedia]WikipediaMünster rebellionMünster rebellion
Tulip mania: a real price craze wrapped in a larger myth
The winter tulip trade of 1636–37 is routinely presented as a national delusion in which Dutch people of every class sold homes and businesses to gamble on bulbs, only to be ruined when prices collapsed. There was genuine speculative excitement. Contracts for certain rare varieties reached remarkable prices, trading accelerated in tavern-based markets and confidence abruptly broke in early February 1637. What is doubtful is the later picture of an entire country abandoning ordinary work and descending into bankruptcy.
Archival research indicates that trading was concentrated among a relatively limited network of merchants, growers and skilled artisans. Some contracts quoted spectacular sums, but a quoted contract was not necessarily completed, and money often had not changed hands before the collapse. Evidence for widespread bankruptcy or lasting damage to the Dutch economy is weak. Contemporary moralising pamphlets mocked traders as greedy fools, and later writers treated those satires as straightforward reportage.[ox.ac.uk]history.ox.ac.ukOxford Historical Society Tulipmania: A Garden Historian's PerspectiveOxford Historical Society Tulipmania: A Garden Historian's Perspective
The familiar story owes much to Charles Mackay’s 1841 book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. Mackay repeated anecdotes written long after the event, including stories of ordinary people sacrificing everything for a single bulb. Modern historians have shown how a small set of satirical and hostile sources was copied repeatedly until it acquired the appearance of abundant evidence. Tulip mania is therefore both a historical market episode and a later crowd delusion about crowd delusion.[Wikipedia]WikipediaTulip maniaTulip mania
None of this means prices were rational or that participants faced no losses. Scholars still debate why the boom and collapse occurred. Proposed explanations include fashion, rarity, rapidly expanding informal contract trading, uncertainty over the enforceability of agreements and new information about the coming bulb crop. One study connects the timing of the February fall to the first visible signs of sprouting, which gave traders information about supply. The safest conclusion is that there was a sharp, socially embarrassing speculative boom, but not the economy-wide madness described in popular legend.[Cambridge University Press & Assessment]cambridge.orgOpen source on cambridge.org.
Religious minorities, charismatic leaders and the “cult” label
Modern Dutch society has hosted many unconventional religious and spiritual groups. Some were authoritarian or harmful; others were merely unfamiliar. The word “cult” often entered public discussion during the Western “cult scares” of the 1970s and 1980s, when new religious movements were commonly portrayed as using irresistible brainwashing techniques. Religious-studies scholars prefer to examine specific practices—coercion, isolation, financial exploitation, abuse or control—rather than assuming that unusual beliefs make a community dangerous.[Religion Media Centre]religionmediacentre.org.ukReligion Media Centre Factsheet: New Religious MovementsReligion Media Centre Factsheet: New Religious Movements
A distinctly Dutch example is Louwrens Voorthuijzen, better known as Lou de Palingboer, or Lou the eel seller. Beginning as a market preacher in Amsterdam, he attracted followers who regarded him as a divine or messianic figure. In the late 1950s, a core group lived communally in a large house at Muiderberg. Accounts describe claims that he embodied the resurrected Christ, possessed healing powers and would not die. Some followers reportedly placed his blessing above medical treatment, while devotion to Lou contributed to family and marital conflict.[Andere Tijden]anderetijden.nlde god die lou heettede god die lou heette
Lou’s group had features associated with a high-control religious community: an exalted leader, communal separation, absolute claims and pressure on intimate relationships. Even so, later retellings frequently turn him into a comic national eccentric—the fishmonger who thought he was God. That framing can conceal why intelligent adults followed him. His message drew on familiar Christian expectations, personal charisma and the attractions of belonging to a small elect community in a rapidly changing post-war society. The movement largely fragmented after his death in 1968, despite claims of immortality.[Andere Tijden]anderetijden.nlde god die lou heettede god die lou heette
The case is useful because it separates two questions too often merged in “cult” stories. Whether Lou’s supernatural claims were true is an evidential question; whether followers were coerced or harmed is a social and ethical one. A group can hold extraordinary beliefs without being criminal, while a conventionally presented organisation can still exercise abusive control. The label alone answers neither question.
Oude Pekela and the Dutch satanic-abuse scare
In 1987, parents in Oude Pekela, a town in Groningen province, became alarmed by reports that young children had been sexually abused by unknown adults. The possibility of abuse deserved careful investigation. Over time, however, some accounts acquired ritual and satanic features, including organised ceremonies and secret networks. The case developed within the wider international satanic-panic environment, in which professionals and campaigners circulated checklists, conference material and narratives about hidden devil-worshipping conspiracies.[sciencedirect.com]sciencedirect.comfirst page pdffirst page pdf
Oude Pekela demonstrates the difficulty of investigating frightened young children. Repeated, leading or assumption-laden questioning can alter accounts without deliberate lying by either child or interviewer. Once adults expect a hidden ritual network, ordinary inconsistencies may be interpreted as evidence of secrecy, trauma or mind control rather than reasons to test the hypothesis. Similarities between children’s stories may reflect shared experience, but they may also arise from common interviewers, parental discussion, publicity or repeated exposure to the same suggested details.
A Dutch government working group reviewed ritual-abuse claims in the 1990s and found no concrete support for the alleged satanic networks. Critics argued that the extraordinary portions of the Oude Pekela narrative had grown through suggestion, professional belief and the circulation of modern legends. This does not establish that no child experienced any mistreatment, nor does it justify dismissing complainants. It means that claims about an organised satanic conspiracy require corroboration independent of testimony produced through potentially contaminating interviews.[skepsis.nl]skepsis.nlOpen source on skepsis.nl.
The legacy influenced Dutch policing and child-protection practice. The Netherlands developed specialist assessment of equivocal sexual-abuse allegations, emphasising alternative explanations, the quality of interviews and the difference between a sincere statement and a historically accurate one. This was partly a response to the danger of false positives—innocent people being accused—but later researchers warned about the opposite danger as well: overcorrection can cause genuine abuse to be missed.[PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPMCA practical approach to sexual abuse allegationsPMCA practical approach to sexual abuse allegations
Why ritual-conspiracy claims keep returning
Allegations of organised ritual abuse did not disappear with the 1980s. Dutch broadcasts between 2018 and 2020 presented testimony from people who reported organised abuse involving ritual elements. The resulting controversy led Parliament to request an independent investigation. The temporary committee’s final report concluded that it had not found supporting evidence for organised abuse with the extreme ritual characteristics described, while also stressing that severe sexual violence and organised abuse are real phenomena requiring serious attention.[Open Overheid]open.overheid.nlOpen Overheid EnglishOpen Overheid English
This distinction is crucial. Rejecting unsupported claims of sacrificial satanic networks is not the same as denying child abuse, trafficking or coercive violence. Moral panics become especially difficult to challenge when a fantastic claim is attached to a genuine social evil. Sceptics risk appearing indifferent to victims, while believers may treat demands for physical evidence as part of the conspiracy. A humane response must provide care to people reporting trauma while keeping criminal findings tied to corroborated evidence.
The same narrative has also merged with online conspiracy culture. From 2021, the municipality of Bodegraven-Reeuwijk faced unfounded claims that it concealed a satanic paedophile network. Followers visited a local cemetery and left flowers at children’s graves, causing distress to families. The municipality sought action against the circulation of the allegations, illustrating how digital repetition can give unsupported stories a physical location, a community of investigators and real-world victims.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian Dutch town falsely linked to satanic paedophiles losesThe Guardian Dutch town falsely linked to satanic paedophiles loses
What the Dutch cases reveal
The Netherlands’ history does not support the comforting idea that panics belong to a uniquely superstitious past. The language changes—from witches and the Devil to brainwashing, ritual networks and viral conspiracy—but the social mechanisms often resemble one another.
Authority can amplify uncertainty. Courts turned village suspicion into capital prosecution; charismatic leaders converted personal revelation into communal certainty; professionals and broadcasters gave institutional weight to claims that remained uncorroborated.
Stories spread through available networks. Early modern accusations moved through interrogations, sermons and pamphlets. Twentieth-century ritual-abuse narratives travelled through conferences, therapy networks and television. Contemporary rumours circulate through social media communities that can continuously reinterpret missing evidence as proof of concealment.
Real danger and exaggerated narratives can coexist. The Amsterdam Anabaptist revolt was a genuine armed attack, but it encouraged persecution of peaceful believers. Child sexual abuse is real, but that does not verify claims of vast satanic organisations. Tulip contracts reached extraordinary prices, but the later myth of nationwide ruin exceeds the documentary record.
Procedure matters more than national character. Dutch people were not inherently more rational during periods with few witch executions, nor uniquely irrational during Roermond or Oude Pekela. Outcomes depended on whether institutions demanded independent evidence, tolerated dissent, used coercive methods or allowed claims to confirm themselves.
The most durable lesson is not that crowds are foolish. People facing illness, religious upheaval, rapid social change or threats to children search for explanations that make danger visible and morally understandable. Collective fear becomes most harmful when the explanation cannot be disproved: denial indicates guilt, missing evidence proves a cover-up, and every new accusation validates the original story. The historical safeguard is therefore not ridicule, but disciplined doubt—combined with fair investigation, care for those reporting harm and a refusal to punish people on the strength of contagious certainty alone.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When Did Dutch Belief Become Public Danger?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds
Rating: 4.0/5 from 5 Google Books ratings
Influential source behind later ideas about collective delusions.
The Demon-Haunted World
Addresses evidence, skepticism and extraordinary public beliefs.
The Embarrassment of Riches
First published 1987. Subjects: Civilization, History, Anthropology, Benelux countries, Dutch.
The witch
First published 2017. Subjects: Witchcraft, Witch hunting, Witches, History, Witchcraft, europe.
Endnotes
1.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Roermond witch trial
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roermond_witch_trial
2.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Melchior Hoffman
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melchior_Hoffman
3.
Source: bundesbank.de
Link:https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/616898/044cc9558e3b32a71900e3a4573531d8/mL/the-anabaptists-of-muenster-1534-1535-data.pdf
Source snippet
Special exhibit - The Anabaptists of Münster 1534-1535In early 1534, Dutch Anabaptists, including Matthys and van Leiden, began...
4.
Source: amsterdam.nl
Link:https://www.amsterdam.nl/stadsarchief/canon/windows/7/
5.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Anabaptist riot
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptist_riot
6.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Münster rebellion
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnster_rebellion
7.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Tulip mania
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania
8.
Source: cambridge.org
Link:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/financial-history-review/article/explaining-the-timing-of-tulipmanias-boom-and-bust-historical-context-sequestered-capital-and-market-signals/20BEB345A7BB4BF2E84C07F9077361A1
9.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Lou de Palingboer
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_de_Palingboer
10.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: first page pdf
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/pdf/download/eid/1-s2.0-014521349190064K/first-page-pdf
11.
Source: skepsis.nl
Link:https://skepsis.nl/rimi/
12.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of satanic ritual abuse allegations
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satanic_ritual_abuse_allegations
13.
Source: open.overheid.nl
Title: Open Overheid English
Link:https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-9781e22883072581ab6f0954f7cddd2baed9464f/pdf
14.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Satanic panic
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_panic
15.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of mass panic cases
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_panic_cases
16.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: New religious movement
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_religious_movement
17.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra%C3%ABlism
18.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: [Witch trials]({{ ‘witch-trials-529d8f/’ | relative_url }}) in the early modern period
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_the_early_modern_period
19.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Mass psychogenic illness
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_psychogenic_illness
20.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Moral Panic: Changing Concepts of the Child Molester in Modern America
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_Panic%3A_Changing_Concepts_of_the_Child_Molester_in_Modern_America
21.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptism
22.
Source: government.nl
Link:https://www.government.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2020/07/01/country-of-origin-information-report-china-july-2020/COI%2BReport%2BChina.pdf
23.
Source: government.nl
Link:https://www.government.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2023/08/31/general-country-of-origin-information-report-on-turkiye-august-2023/General%2BCOI%2Breport%2BTurkiye%2B%28August%2B2023%29.pdf
24.
Source: government.nl
Title: EN AAB+Nigeria 2021+ +DEFINITIEF++maart final
Link:https://www.government.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2021/03/31/country-of-origin-information-report-nigeria-march-2021/EN_AAB%2BNigeria%2B2018-2021%2B-%2BDEFINITIEF%2B-%2B31%2Bmaart%2B2021_final.pdf
25.
Source: history.com
Title: what was satanic panic 1980s
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/what-was-satanic-panic-1980s
26.
Source: the-low-countries.com
Title: The Tulip: the Myth, the Mania and the Man
Link:https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/the-tulip-the-myth-the-mania-and-the-man/
27.
Source: archive.org
Title: melchiorhoffmans0000depp g1s8
Link:https://archive.org/details/melchiorhoffmans0000depp_g1s8
28.
Source: hartvanlimburg.nl
Title: witches roermond mysterious stories
Link:https://www.hartvanlimburg.nl/en/witches-roermond-mysterious-stories
Source snippet
Hart van LimburgWitches in Roermond – Mysterious StoriesIn 1613 and 1614, Roermond was the scene of the largest witch trials in the Nethe...
29.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/04/dutch-feminists-campaign-for-national-monument-to-witches
Source snippet
They have raised €35,000 for this cause, seeking to highlight the tragedies that occurred due to mass hysteria and the scapegoating of "w...
30.
Source: dutchdissenters.net
Link:https://dutchdissenters.net/wp/2015/05/10may1535/
31.
Source: history.ox.ac.uk
Title: Oxford Historical Society Tulipmania: A Garden Historian’s Perspective
Link:https://www.history.ox.ac.uk/tulipmania-garden-historians-perspective
32.
Source: smithsonianmag.com
Title: there never was real tulip fever 180964915
Link:https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/there-never-was-real-tulip-fever-180964915/
33.
Source: religionmediacentre.org.uk
Title: Religion Media Centre Factsheet: New Religious Movements
Link:https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/factsheets/factsheet-new-religious-movements/
34.
Source: anderetijden.nl
Title: de god die lou heette
Link:https://anderetijden.nl/aflevering/434/de-god-die-lou-heette
35.
Source: semanticscholar.org
Link:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a75f7b36f0c11cd31c6e179d33f400fb83156f4a
36.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: PMCA practical approach to sexual abuse allegations
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9176321/
37.
Source: repository.wodc.nl
Link:https://repository.wodc.nl/bitstreams/dc02153a-c86b-4d01-a3fb-431f1c188d60/download
38.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: The Guardian Dutch town falsely linked to satanic paedophiles loses
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/04/dutch-town-falsely-linked-to-satanic-paedophiles-loses-twitter-court-case
39.
Source: semanticscholar.org
Link:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7f12a35ecb26c2001dc109de95e20984315cda5
40.
Source: guides.loc.gov
Title: tulip mania
Link:https://guides.loc.gov/business-booms-busts/tulip-mania
41.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6892302/
42.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6266763/
43.
Source: discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3001
44.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: dutch government faces collapse over child benefits scandal
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/14/dutch-government-faces-collapse-over-child-benefits-scandal
45.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: chatgpt driving rise in reports of satanic organised ritual abuse uk experts say
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/08/chatgpt-driving-rise-in-reports-of-satanic-organised-ritual-abuse-uk-experts-say
Additional References
46.
Source: meertens.knaw.nl
Title: Meertens Instituut Blécourt, dr
Link:https://meertens.knaw.nl/medewerker/blecourt-dr-w-de-willem/
Source snippet
W. de (Willem) - Meertens Instituut - KNAWW. de Blécourt (2010). Witchcraft Before the Witch Trials. 08-11-2010... The Flying Witch: Its...
47.
Source: pure.knaw.nl
Link:https://pure.knaw.nl/ws/files/476954/Werewolf%2C_Witch_%26_Warlock.pdf
Source snippet
ssed traits in common with fairies.z...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Echoes of Injustice – The Dark Heritage of Witch Trials in Dutch Memory
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZQe0uLQZjA
Source snippet
DUTCH WITCH TRIALS | Laura's Legends | 02 Utrecht...
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Tulip Mania: The First Financial Bubble in History
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkgWmjThm7E
Source snippet
The Satanic Panic was Built on Lies | Satan Wants You | On Docs Podcast...
50.
Source: jstor.org
Link:https://www.jstor.org/stable/2541180
Source snippet
The Anabaptist Movement in Amsterdam and...by GK Waite · 1987 · Cited by 16 — This article examines the social make up and developm...
51.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228244452_Inquiries_into_Fatal_Child_Abuse_in_the_Netherlands_A_Source_of_Improvement
52.
Source: estd.org
Link:https://estd.org/article/a-dutch-investigative-radio-program-on-organized-abuse-with-ritual-elements/
53.
Source: brill.com
Link:https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004273276/BP000003.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOorHsNGAmtt59G0ZwO5eLSeNetLBPLjXaqOJ5JOqlaKcoilEqUTI
54.
Source: baptist.org.uk
Link:https://www.baptist.org.uk/Publisher/File.aspx?ID=370118
55.
Source: britsoccrim.org
Link:https://www.britsoccrim.org/volume3/004.pdf
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 192
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Argentina Belief Scares
- Azerbaijan Belief
- Bahrain Beliefs
- North Korea
- +187 more in sidebar